Skip to published state

authority ledger / erdos

13 pending

Erdős formalization fidelity: review

Proposal standing and signed decisions at this exact published snapshot.

Evidence is not acceptance
Verification can support a proposal. It cannot supply the scientific decision.
  1. EvidenceA bounded artifact is recorded.
  2. VerifierA named check reproduces the result.
  3. ProposalA claim enters review without changing accepted state.
  4. DecisionA registered human or exact policy supplies authority.
  5. StandingOnly the signed decision changes accepted state.
108
13
94
1
Latest terminal decision
Jul 17, 2026, 7:09 PM
rejectedvpr_f54338a5a453c1bf

The producer Receipt and bounded result remain preserved, but the durable Engine gate has zero independent attachments and no surviving adversarial probe. Verifier success alone is not scientific acceptance.

Signed by reviewer:will-blair; provenance: signed event.

Exact decision provenanceDecision event, plan, proposal, and Receipt roots
vev_32667676119a30cb
sha256:b1c471e260c7025e10c7de9e6293a9ed8a92d135ad114a2a89af5eda9f527b14
sha256:baba10a7c8639c04673e7ea7c875c4c22a89b9448c7674b30cfcb98747650edd
sha256:6010cf159e7ee5d7867a6553b9f44eb5a1b153f87c38f09b9505d5656a943373

Proposal ledger

standing, not verdict quality

108 proposals

  1. vpr_501cbeec70cd719c

    finding.add · Jul 19, 2026, 1:46 AM

    pending review

    Exhaustive registered search over primes in 10428401..10428600 completed with a bounded negative result; the maximum factorial-residue fiber multiplicity found was 12 at p=10428581, residue=5141590.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:e3f349235c7f4f2afd70c885d63c8e82beac4c86a677f4a86503d4108b597e2c
    Receipt
    sha256:263506aae0144fb2aa4784ff9c145c6c41886b2956191c6458214cedd0bfd4aa
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  2. vpr_f54338a5a453c1bf

    finding.add · Jul 17, 2026, 7:09 PM

    rejected

    Completed the exact bounded search over primes in 10428201..10428400 and produced the required artifact; no witness with multiplicity at least 16 was found, and the best multiplicity in-range was 10 at p=10428241, residue=3789711.

    The producer Receipt and bounded result remain preserved, but the durable Engine gate has zero independent attachments and no surviving adversarial probe. Verifier success alone is not scientific acceptance.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:baba10a7c8639c04673e7ea7c875c4c22a89b9448c7674b30cfcb98747650edd
    Receipt
    sha256:6010cf159e7ee5d7867a6553b9f44eb5a1b153f87c38f09b9505d5656a943373
    Decision plan
    sha256:b1c471e260c7025e10c7de9e6293a9ed8a92d135ad114a2a89af5eda9f527b14
    Decision event
    vev_32667676119a30cb
  3. vpr_12b236db3fc0b409

    governance.policy_legacy_retirement · Jul 16, 2026, 2:07 PM

    applied

    Retire the unsupported prelaunch active-policy byte pair after preserving its content roots and confirming it admitted no state.

    Retire unsupported prelaunch policy bytes without changing scientific state.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:a5272ffb292177eb9aa2a816056fb0ff93dea5a6f2be066f67a633c0c848940a
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    sha256:b2b7d2998a45627d53b61396e48692a67aee0d619b413b473732305cb35fa448
    Decision event
    vev_27922b9c8dab0575
  4. vpr_e1f84b3df6176057

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:58 PM

    pending review

    The exact remaining Erdős 730 gate is the exhaustive common-multiplicity event cover (23), followed by an explicit delta > 0 proving uniformly for X >= 2^57 that FirstPowerFar(X)/X + ShortTop(X)/X <= 1779/2500 - delta; neither step is proved at the pinned commit.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:fb77773ee9c2bacb87054952790f1a75d74c2692393453fbb59a2996915ce6a9
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  5. vpr_113aed3795936596

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:58 PM

    pending review

    At first power, subtracting the fixed block shift leaves a multiple of the square prime modulus.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:86505d52ffa8810fe3667929820b9578099710e1f19fb04741bda8f0689dac35
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  6. vpr_ed8c9ab64b4ff8f7

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:58 PM

    pending review

    ExplicitDicksonAP12PrimeTupleSupplyK2 is the still-open assertion that for every U there is u >= U for which 48(12u)+29, 76(12u)+65, 38(12u)+23, and 48(12u)+41 are all prime; even this supplies only k=2, so the other fixed k >= 2 cases remain.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:74c7b99a9b75a349fd4fd57126db11eff93c83c5ce04b98cbb4226acf040fb71
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  7. vpr_0dafa95e010040a4

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:58 PM

    pending review

    theorem erdosK2_of_explicitDicksonAP12PrimeTupleSupply (hSupply : ExplicitDicksonAP12PrimeTupleSupplyK2) : erdosFixed 2

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:fe749d623d3078b7abf3782106c0d26f9bf1695b5d1f5ba34b3a96144baab6f8
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  8. vpr_81fdde564da0b1db

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:58 PM

    pending review

    The exact C2 residual is a universal no-surviving reduced-divisor split theorem; beyond that internal kernel, T4, full T6 and T7, the global kernel, and all later rungs remain unclaimed.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:5159a767f6b30c9447165bfb71a9717d1711ab9263a97c2984fd9cbf1f8c3cf2
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  9. vpr_ea0c7dc317f8b6e3

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:57 PM

    pending review

    Coprime-refined existence-level C2 bridge. The extra coprimality condition is automatic from the split product identity, but recording it here matches the exact reduced-divisor obstruction used in the C2 analysis.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:1382a7eb73678562529fc9bc2e2a94b018f69d39d46ea5d50e2d2117916a0b5b
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  10. vpr_a4c6faa9cd3638c9

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:57 PM

    pending review

    The remaining mathematical content for the pinned Erdős 686 refutation is exactly OddThueTail1000Hypothesis and LargeKSmoothHypothesis; equivalently, it is FinalResidual686Hypothesis.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:2c6c1c1bc6e27726ae143068afed2e9ef1b95a6a17230b2624cbf4539b3b28be
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  11. vpr_75180631e660bb22

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:57 PM

    pending review

    The explicit final residual interface is logically equivalent to the conjunction of the updated odd-tail and large-smoothness hypotheses.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:78c096c0410ad34276e5253a5970f2a71814023a17acd11477bc5694371d7ad6
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  12. vpr_a0d9607651720925

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:57 PM

    pending review

    Conditional reduction of the r=5 case: if every balanced coloring of K_26 has extension demand exceeding 25 at some vertex, the Erdos-Gyarfas conjecture holds for r=5.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:253b40587abe3071e932fb3afd8d0092cb2b640f77026540f74d0dab5afe0ec0
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  13. vpr_ba38fa1f70e47e97

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:57 PM

    pending review

    For Sidon sets A with |A| ~ N^{1/2}, the sumset A+A is equidistributed over residue classes mod m: each class holds ~1/m of A+A.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:27c6ad3748310212a9107ac8a6ba92f542775d17559632b42192696c274e477b
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  14. vpr_f374ac37dbbacf9d

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:57 PM

    pending review

    After the d = 2s - 2 closure, the one-stub all-nonbridge RL residual has 5 <= s and d <= 2s - 3; the multi-stub pair inequality and the final connected or 2-connected core remain separate obligations.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:8d174c5355e34964e3b60e03af56e5bd1e744c787114ce3ea1e1e16a95b0cefb
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  15. vpr_c267001fd53978a2

    finding.add · Jul 13, 2026, 6:57 PM

    pending review

    At d equal to twice the slack minus two, fully nonbridge corridor geometry, the rooted cut condition, injective simple demand pairs, legality, and same-color endpoints imply the exact RL internal-cost budget across all five canonical two-defect shapes.

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    sha256:c0e945330b25a643eae7e1544a86543ad1d9acaa2cf0d9b163d271e106b80cdb
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  16. vpr_9f44e38d8c3559fa

    finding.retract · Jul 6, 2026, 12:32 AM

    applied

    duplicate of the catalog problem-finding, unlinked; the finite confirmation lives in the reproducible witness, not a standalone finding

    Applied locally from proposal creation

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  17. vpr_3a7af37d2f61bb4c

    finding.retract · Jul 6, 2026, 12:32 AM

    applied

    duplicate of the catalog problem-finding, unlinked; the finite confirmation lives in the reproducible witness, not a standalone finding

    Applied locally from proposal creation

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  18. vpr_388ccc64e7c75d45

    finding.retract · Jul 6, 2026, 12:32 AM

    applied

    duplicate of the catalog problem-finding, unlinked; the finite confirmation lives in the reproducible witness, not a standalone finding

    Applied locally from proposal creation

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  19. vpr_703a2e60388df4e9

    finding.retract · Jul 6, 2026, 12:32 AM

    applied

    duplicate of the catalog problem-finding, unlinked; the finite confirmation lives in the reproducible witness, not a standalone finding

    Applied locally from proposal creation

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  20. vpr_b80d290b832f3302

    finding.retract · Jul 6, 2026, 12:32 AM

    applied

    duplicate of the catalog problem-finding, unlinked; the finite confirmation lives in the reproducible witness, not a standalone finding

    Applied locally from proposal creation

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  21. vpr_7176d9d880c477a2

    finding.retract · Jul 6, 2026, 12:32 AM

    applied

    duplicate of the catalog problem-finding, unlinked; the finite confirmation lives in the reproducible witness, not a standalone finding

    Applied locally from proposal creation

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  22. vpr_c5f1614f6bb1c191

    finding.add · Jul 5, 2026, 10:57 PM

    applied

    Erdős #475 (distinct partial sums), finite confirmation: for every prime p ∈ {2,3,5,7,11,13}, all nonempty A ⊆ F_p\{0} admit an ordering with distinct partial sums mod p (subset counts 1,3,15,63,1023,4095 checked exhaustively). The question over all primes is the open problem.

    accepted via sign

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  23. vpr_2ee5fdab44dfd341

    finding.add · Jul 5, 2026, 10:57 PM

    applied

    Erdős #366, finite confirmation: no 2-full n with n+1 3-full in [1, 10000000]. The question over all integers is the open problem.

    accepted via sign

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  24. vpr_a50fba115d0f42dd

    finding.add · Jul 5, 2026, 10:57 PM

    applied

    Erdős #364, finite confirmation: no three consecutive powerful integers in [1, 1000000] (consecutive powerful pairs do occur, e.g. 8,9). The question over all integers is the open problem.

    accepted via sign

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded
  25. vpr_d8de96aacc378dfd

    finding.add · Jul 5, 2026, 10:57 PM

    applied

    Erdős #306, finite confirmation: 64 reduced a/b (b squarefree) each expand as distinct squarefree-semiprime Egyptian unit fractions. The question over all positive rationals is the open problem.

    accepted via sign

    Inspect exact provenance
    Proposal
    not recorded
    Receipt
    not recorded
    Decision plan
    not recorded
    Decision event
    not recorded

Page 1 of 5